Where the underdog gets an extra byte

   Home   Sunday TCWJ    Cricket Books      Cricket Poems    Cricket Cartoons   N Balajhi   Alternate View (IE8+)  

How vain it is to sit down to write when you have not stood up to live - Henry David Thoreau

Sunday, 30 March 2008

Md.Kaif Gets a Call

Click this icon for all India vs South Africa 2008 articles @ TCWJ A pregnant chad of an opportunity

Cricketnext.com reports that Md.Kaif has been drafted in for injured Sachin.

Let me take you back sometime, to the time when the Duleep Trophy was going on, to a blogpost by good friend Straight Point titled A case for Kaif over at his blog.

The discussion there centered around the consistency Kaif was showing, despite the scarcity of really huge eye-catching scores, and the possibility that he could be working rather usefully for a test recall ahead of the many young contenders.

Kaif too is young you know!

What attracted one's attention was the progress in Kaif's longer version game. All the one-dayers and the need to be consistently innovative at no.7 for a limited-over busy Team India, while not geting a chance to play the longer version at any level as a consequence, had retarded his inherent strength and style of play, which was test match cricket.

A little over a year ago, there was a similar discussion at 606 when the debate was over who between Yuvraj and Kaif should play in tests. At that time, without denying the enormous potential of Yuvi to be a match-turner anytime, one couldn't help bring up the comparable stats of both and the more well-rounded game of Kaif over Yuvraj's confusion over spin.

This call-up as a replacement may be just a hanging chad, or a dimpled chad perhaps, or maybe a "pregnant" chad, but it is a chad nevertheless. A clear indicator of how the selectors mean to look at potential suitors for a vacant India test spot. Get your longer game in shape before you look to leap from very limited to limited to unlimited.

It is also an acknowledgement, in a way, that much harm was done to these youngsters of then by keeping them away from their natural process of learning. Also, of the fact that Kaif's, or any talented domestic player's, toils on the circuit will not go unrecognized.

Chopra got edged out of contention by a combination of factors beyond his control despite the best he did with those he could control. Kaif too has been persevering with what he could control. He has revived his instinctual test class batting, practiced the ability to concentrate for long periods in the middle, shelved some of the irritating diversions of limited overs which had taken over his game, and basically completed an interrupted higher education in the art of playing cricket. Yuvraj simply refuses to even consider re-entering the portals of this university, much less work in an adult literacy programme to smarten up important missing aspects of his game. Both Yuvraj and Kaif have comparable stats in tests, which are sorely lesser than what one hoped from them.

Hope....how can you hope without arming a chap with the necessary stuff? How can you hope if you are blinkered that every teenager is a Sachin? By the way, Sachin had a balanced entry into cricket through tests rather than the skewed ones of Kaif and Yuvraj.

I bring this up because there are calls for repeating these very mistakes one made with Kaifi and Yuvi - there is a sense of urgency to inject Rohit Sharma into the no.5 slot of the test team. Fine player that he is in limited overs, I'm looking to see how he does in the longer version...I don't find much yet. None of the youngsters have most aspects of the test team covered yet and we are snatching them away before they are ready.

What's the use of pulling kids from school, putting them to work for a few years in the hell-hole of a busy chaai stall, which offers no nutrition, no learning, no growth, no future (travelling with the Indian limited over side is like that...only financially more rewarding), and then trying to make amends by rescuing the child labor and putting them back in school?

Isn't it better that they be allowed to go through it out first? Get ready for the big game through some useful hours of practice? I could be a glider pilot or a single-engine pilot in some aero club, that doesn't mean I'm ready to fly an A 380 from here to wherever on the other side of the globe!

Raina is another example. International cricket, especially test cricket, cruelly exposes your limitations. If you have the talent, there is hope for improvements. If you aren't with that talent, then there is very little you can do.

These boys are talented....some are willing to make the adjustments, some hope to slip past in continuous denial, some are willing to go back to the drawing board and work things out, some are willing to set up a CV first (re: Chatteshwar Pujara)...but why create such a mess in the first place?

In a discussion elsewhere going on currently, on the eventual replacements in the Indian test team, I said as follows about Pujara.

Pujara is making faster improvements.

Attacking southpaw who usually plays at no.3. Young and used to play long innings and taking responsibility for his mediocre team. He has often be the lone performer for his team and bailed them out often. I'm looking for that kind of attitude to fit into that slot vacated by Laxman.

Someone who can stay and someone who can step on the gas as needed. And with technique as well.


The fact is that's a generic comment...it could be about Tiwary or a Raina who are also building up a strong CV now...a generic requirement for all newcomers who are looking to seal it with the Indian test team. First learn doing what is needed in different situations of the LONGER game, then do it once more and perhaps practice it yet again before you consider yourself ready.

Kaif may not get to play after all this, he may never get to play a test again, or he may just use this pregnant chad of an opportunity and actually carry on forward without further interference from the supreme court of BCCI. Whatever he does, he has firmly highlighted the dangers of the way we handle our teen cricketers.

13 comments:

scorpicity said...

This is great news... at least for the sake of a system in place... as per the domestic rankings, he was number 2 and perhaps it is fair that he is inducted. As for your observations on yuvraj not wanting to get back to the university to iron out his flaws... bang on... too much star power gets you blind... and he is blind.

Straight Point said...

thanks SB for the mention!!

ts was nice and pleasant reminder to him that he is still wanted...

its fills one's esteem no end when one nows that all his deeds are not forgotten and is still in frame for scheme of things...

i have a feeling that fate is turning and luck is finally smiling on him...

you have also raised very valid point in terms of hurrying up RS...

yuvi is living example in this regard for everubody to follow...the guy can still play spin authoritatively despite being in the team like ages...coz he has not played a season in DC to iron out his technique against spinners and other flaws...

RS is yet untested in longer form of game and i think should be at least given a season to prove his credential for the middle order spot claim...

i read somewhere today how mumbai captain is not happy with his attitude towards his indifference to stay at wicket...and him being still in 2020 and ODI mode...

in the CB series itself harsha was discussing about his relatively poor showing for mumbai and saying that if he averages so low then there must be some problem there...2020 and ODIs forms can sometimes mask your flaws but you will eventually get caught out in longer form of cricket...

we must stuff this in our yougsters head if india wants to be numero uno in test cricket...coz there are already lots of distraction happening these days...

Q said...

I remember mentiong in SPs post that Kaif deserved better treatment. And I also remember mentioning on your blog SB that Kaif should be back in the fold within the next year or so.

Sachin's injury has fast tracked that process but he's only in the squad I don't think he will play. Yuvraj will probably play instead of Sachin.

So how long before Kaif is a permanent fixture in th XI?

LBW said...

I am not for Kaif. But, the selections that Vengsarkar does, are done with a purpose and with an eye on the long run. I am sure Vengsarkar has an eye on Kaif for the ODI side too.

Soulberry, I see Chateshwar is a solid 5 day player. But, he hasn't been tested at levels higher than domestic cricket. He toured Kenya A but that is hardly even close to International attacks.

Soulberry said...

Hi All,

Q, the factor which coould have prompted his selection was the gritty 80 he scored on a fastish pitch at Vadodra in the Ranji semis while all batsmen were falling over.

I give you this link to that low-scoring match. Dilip Vengsarkar was watching that match...I saw him on Neo sitting in the stadium while all attention was focussed on the Indian team in Australia.

I think he'll play ahead of Yuvraj...otherwise there is no point in selecting him. The captain and coach could have their say of course.

SP, always appreciate a straight but simple point from you. :)

You and Scorpi have made an important observation...how to sift through the domestic performances and pick out the worthwhile ones. The fact that that effort is being made, even if only for a spot or two, is good. It keeps the DC players on their toes as well as the incumbents.

Ultimately, the replacements for the quartet are going to come from here....not from Mars or Jupiter!

Soulberry said...

Yenkayya, I watched Kaif through the past two seasons in the domestic circuit. He has reverted to his original game as a U15, which was basically moulded to suit the longer game.

He hasn't the eye-catching scores, but he will do a solid job at the spot he is asked to man. He has been doing so consistently for UP and Central Zone.

Chatteshwar Pujara hasn't been tested and that is true. It is also sad in a way that he hasn't been on more A teams.

I ask you a question Yenkayya, what about those who have been on A tours? Have they qualified in the testing?

The point is replacements are going to come from domestic circuit and nowhere else, and we have to line up those who are doing a consistent job in different situations and put them up for closer examination. It ios from them that one has to pick up those who fulfill the criteria.

I would be chary of basing a test selection on T20 performamnces and to an extent, ODI performances.

We have seen a decade of that and seen that the best fruit have come up through the longer grind. (more applicable to batsmen than bowlers...can't be picky about bowlers in India)

In the past ten years we have brought in many batsmen through the limited overs route and I cannot recall one name which has done justice in the test team till now through that route...not Dhoni, not Yuvraj, not Kaif till he took the eductaional sabbatical, not Raina, not...who?

Pathan is the sole exception, but that is because he was a bowler first, and now he too is a fringe player.

I would emphasize different identification methods than those for test selction.

Domestic cricket has been the basis for long...including for Tendulkar, Kambli, Ganguly, Dravid, Laxman,Sehwag, Jaffer, DK...Kumble if a bowler is to be considered too..the better performers of the past decade.

With the exception of Sachin (even he came through the test match route) who had a briefest fo domestic sojourns (an exception) most others came from a far poorer domestic set-up with solid performances there over at least a few seasons.

I am unwilling to write-off the domestic circuit's utility in this regard.

Those who do well over a few seasons, are more likely to succeed in test matches than those who do not or purely ODI based.

Q said...

I would like to see him play ahead of Yuvraj. Lets hope ur hunch is correct.

Naked Cricket said...

Enough substance here to be charged for substance abuse :)
good, heady stuff soulberry. the ODI-test selection chaos in indian cricket's blindspot. like to share a prehistoric piece with you:
http://nakedcricket.sulekha.com/blog/post/2007/01/many-happy-returns-to-australia-.htm
cheers!

Straightdrive said...

Kaif's inclusion came as a surprise. I never expected this and thought he may well be sidelined. Good that he is picked up again. Question is what will they do with him when Sachin returns. Will he get the nod ahead of Yuvraj at Ahmedabd? I wish he does.

SB, I share your views on Kaif and his batting definitely sufferred due No.7 slot in ODIs. He is a far better batsman than his avg suggests. He could be the answer when Rahul leaves the scene. Till that time he needs support, which was absent during India's SA tour, from the team management and selectors. He should be ahead of Yuvraj when it comes to tests. I wish he is kept and nurtured for tests.

Cricket Guru said...

Hi SB, all,

I am with 'Dr Alban' :) on this issue. I was surprised to read about Kaif's inclusion.

It makes little sense to include him in the test team and make him carry drinks. I would much rather find a place for him in the ODIs. He may have made his way up through the domestic circuit, but somehow, I am still not convinced of his ability to play the longer version.

That said, in next couple of years, we will have four middle order slots up for grab. And as you mentioned, only Cheteshwar Pujara has been talked of as 'test' material. S Badrinath would probably fit that grade too. That leaves Yuvi, Kaif, Sharma, Tiwari and Raina to slog it out for the two spots.

LBW said...

what about those who have been on A tours? Have they qualified in the testing?
__________________________

SB,
In the A tours, both the Pathans, Kaif, Cheteshwar, Praveen, Badrinath played. It is anybody's guess - Pathans, Cheteshwar, Praveen, Badri were successful - Kaif wasn't. However, I take your word into consideration as you have the 1st hand info and the benefit of watching him play. Most of us have only glanced the scores, not knowing who is technically correct. I think you are referring to the Sourashtra vs UP match in which Kaif scored 80+ and we had a discussion (elsewhere) on the change of pitches in India. What was the quality of bowling (not to undermine his score but just to know)?

Cricketguru, Namaste - longtime, No see!

Soulberry said...

Yenkayya, I was looking over the stats of the players called up to play for India, initially as pure batsmen, over the past dozen years. There were sixteen of them beginning from Vikram Rathore.

It doesn't look good at the moment (I'm trying to brush up my stats analysis thingy through online tuts first for my old textbooks are not immediately available) for those who put in a few years of domestic cricket ahead of their induction, despite the skewing factors of Ganguly, Dravid and Laxman, and to an extent Jaffer, who follow Rathore, for the rest of them, haven't done much at the test level. However, it doesn't look great for those who played mostly limited overs cricket instead of sufficient long games either. it is a narrow sample here...mainly Yuvraj and Kaif (even though kaif has much more longer version experience than Yuvraj through it all). I'm trying to recall how to apply the Chi square/students t- test...been a while since I fiddled with those!

Like CG says (Hi there! Where have you been? and who is Dr. Alban here? :) I've come across him on forums though) the probables will have to earn their slots.

We have had enough experience with players not doing too well after coming in young and through the ODI scene.

Pujara and Badri are performing...Yenkayya, the bowling on that pitch was bolstered by the pitch...it would stand to reason that they must have a couple of things figured out about how to play the longer version which some other have not.

Raina is a fine example as well...today he has added to his range. The efforts he is putting in now are going to stand him in good stead. Rohit has a problem in this regard and isn't exactly a Sachin to merit avoidance of the drudgery of grinding it for a useful couple of seasons. he need not look farther than Yuvraj in his dressing room...the man has traded in something for something else.

Gaurav...what a fine article! I didn't kow you wrote all that way back!

There need to be different factors considered for different games....Ganguly isn't going to be automatic selection for T20...likewise Rohit or Yuvraj cannot be automatic selections for the test teams. Rohit has time to work it out...Yuvraj may succeeed after Murali retires (but even lesser spinners have troubled him and his off-side play is so dictated by the ODI style), but I really don't think he has tried beyond a limit.

He would be a great asset for India test team if he works on a couple of issues, but the impression he conveys is that he isn't too bothered by it.

Why couldn't he apply pressure on any of the existing folks by putting up significant scores when in domestic when not playing test matches? He has often shied from that on some pretext or the other....and that is disappointing.

One senses Rohit could be in the same route...but he is neither a Yuvraj nor a Sachin and if he fails to sustain his one-day performance, he'll suffer. Why not bolster your chances with something to back you up?

Raina and Kaif have been included in respective teams based on their past two years improvement observed. let's see where it goes from here...the drinks trolley would be a huge shame.

Related Posts with Thumbnails