View Larger Map
That's the one...that's the home for some memorable moments of test cricket.
If its hallowed content of cricket history had transpired at Eden gardens, or one of the Mumbai stadia, it is possible that history would have been better presented and recalled by cricket watchers.
Stretching back fifteen years and over seven test matches, India has always won a test match in this period here and that many test matches, in a sequence. Cricinfo No draws in between and certainly no losses. I doubt if India has a happier hunting ground than this historical Delhi cricket pitch.
They lost here more than 20 years ago, soon after Sunny Gavaskar retired, to the Richards-led West Indian team in the winter of 1987. In this reverse-ordered match where both first innings were insubstantial, Cheeka, the current CoS played and so did Vengsarkar - the recently retired CoS. This was also the first match of the series v WI 87 which saw another selector, credited with the actual selection of Mishra and charged with the repair of Chawla, Narendra Hirwani, make his debut later. Madras 87
The Australians are coming here, to such a Delhi from Mohali, to play a test match. They come as underdogs - not strange for Australia in India, but surprising all the same in the overall context. 
Ricky Ponting finds himself in a unique position - of having to turn Australian fortunes around is not stuff of uniqueness - to have to do that, knowing he doesn't have the boom-boom-boomers for it, means he will have to be cunningly creative with whatever ack-ack he has. That, to me is an evolutionary step for Ricky Ponting as captain. He has been "creative" in the past, but that didn't wash well with anybody but the most jingo of the Australian fans. This time, he has to be creatively creative...like someone breathing a new life into the team and his own dreams (he still hasn't won a test series here as skip), like what Allan Border did to a team swamped under reconstruction all those years ago. A truly unique test of Ricky.
The last time both teams met here, Tendulkar led India to a crushing seven-wicket victory over Mark Taylor's Australians.First B-G Trophy match This was the only match of the series, set-up soon after the England series which saw the emergence of Ganguly and Dravid. This was also the inaugural match of the Border-Gavaskar Trophy - the only match of the series.
Later during the tour, the infamous triangular Titan Cup transpiredCricinfo - the one which proved the undoing of a set of cricketing stars - between Australia, India and South Africa. The very same Titan Cup which Hansie Cronje confessed to later.CBI Report
But I digress...
Ferozeshah Kotla is where Sunny first equalled The Don's world record 29 centuries29 - TCWJ, Cricinfo. It was also here that Sachin Tendulkar went beyond Sunny's record total of 34 test hundreds Cricinfo with his 35th, against the visiting Sri Lankan team of 2005. He must look forward to score his 40th here as well! The first time anybody would have scored 40 test centuries!
This is also the pitch where Anil Kumble took all ten.Cricinfo No wonder he is raring to go today!Cricket 365.com
"While I unfortunately had to sit this one out, I'm raring to get going at the Kotla, my favourite Test centre," - Anil Kumble following Mohali
Anil Kumble is also the leading wicket-taker at this stadium in test matches. Most Wks @ Kotla At this ground where Mishra has also played plenty of his cricket.
In the last six months, Kumble, the great bowler that he is, has bowled in seven innings for a return of eight wickets at an average of 70.00. Cricinfo Since most of those innings were in Sri Lanka only, let us go back an entire year for a more objective idea of form. Last 12 months
50 wickets at about 10 points above normal average and a strike rate which is about 12 points off his usual. It is possible the reason for this year's performance is the very same shoulder which finally seized up at Mohali - it is possible the shoulder was troubling him throughout this period, with Mishra not on DB Vengy's radar esconsed in BCCI HQ Mumbai, and Piyush scaring the pants off Kumble enough to force him to play on despite his troubles. Otherwise I am sure the figures would have been par with his usual.
Anil has declared his shoulder is better and that Mishra is a fine prospect for the future. Well, he is the captain, and must play. An injury sit-out is not the time to spring a mean trick on Anil.
Mishra may have taken seven wickets in two innings, but he must wait. Even though the princely throne is an unstable one - he has just displaced the previous heir-apparent - that's about as close he gets to the kingly throne at the moment. How he hangs on to the slippery sides of it, he must figure out himself.
But, it may all not come to that - Mishra may yet play - and not merely as a cover for Kumble but as a replacement for VVS Laxman!
I had mentioned earlier that two influential persons in Indian cricket had quietly let off a bomb under Laxman's undersides after Mishra performed at Mohali Merit Among the Pigeons - he hadn't scored in that test match, is not a Mumboy Tendulkar...sickle and hammer Ganguly...or a quietly ferocious software called Rahul Dravid, belongs to Shivlal Yadav's team in South Zone, and has been booted by Deccan Herald as well...so easy meat - Times of India tells me that they actually are developing the idea of accomodation further into an actual playing philosophy!TOI
I would like to ask what is the logic here of the wise ones - India bowling is taking 20 wickets; Kumble's shoulder is better so he will take up Mishra's role and record at least as many wickets here: it is the Indian batting which has been precarious. Don't mask it with the glow of the first victory of this series. Don't mask it because of the ease of India's biggest run-margin victory which was essentially set up by its bowlers on a batting wicket.
All I ask is replace a batsman with a batsman if you want...if you want to replace Laxman at any cost, replace him with any batsman you have in mind...even if it is Rohit Sharma, though Chatteshwar Pujara is a better idea. But explain to me what is the logic of replacing Laxman with Anil Kumble? That too on a Kotla pitch where batsmen are required and bowlers do well - the last 8 matches have produced results, 7-1 to India Cricinfo - so batsmen are needed here while bowlers will do well.
How many of those 8 matches featured five bowlers bowling for India at Kotla?
This is ad-hocism if it happens. and the worst kind because it comes right off the top of the heads of two men considered wise, highly influential with one of them the NCA director, but that day in the avatar of TV commentators who had to give a good soundbyte but were afraid to say that either Kumble or Mishra should be dropped.
They fence-sat - both Sunny Gavaskar and Ravi Shastri back then - fence-sat like the shamelessly thick-skinned but naturally helpless row of bummed-up dawn-line sitters along the empty railway line outside your halted coach window waiting for a signal, who periodically keep expelling obscene soundbytes and foul odors up your way. Now their fence-sitting could become a strange ad-hoc nonsense philosophy...and they are supposed to share with us eediuts the great collective cricketing wisdom born in Shivaji Park!Geobeats - Video If you are a Mumbaiyya, aren't you supposed to reek cricketing wisdom even from where you aren't supposed to reek?
Disappointed - terribly, by those one looked up to as direction-givers of Indian cricket. Media wallowing appears to dilute this ablity and they forget that what they say can spawn plenty articles and as many controversies besides setting policies.
Hopefully things will not come to such a stupid pass as suggested by, otherwise smart men, and India's good record over the past 15 years at Delhi will not be destroyed by such cowardly suggestions.
Hopefully, by the time the Kotla test match comes along, such gaseous expulsions as we have heard and read would have been taken away by the wind, or forgotten like one forgets TV talking heads, and logical commonsense prevails in team selection WITH A VIEW TO SEAL THIS SERIES HERE AND NOW!
I'll say it for them, and for India, and for Mishra, without fear...drop Mishra if Kumble must play. At least now the world knows who is the next leg-spinner who will play for India...or should. Mishra knows and is gracious enough to allow Kumble to wind up his career as he sees fit...within physiological limits of commonsense of course.
Dropping Laxman is wrong in itself, but even if we consider that as an inevitable part of change, then a bastman should come in. Everything else is against commonsense and simple cricketing logic.
India vs Australia 2008-09, Preview 3rd Test at Ferozeshah Kotla, Delhi.











18 comments:
That's a very good post SB an emphatic one too. I hope our selectors and the team management read this.
By the way, Cheeka seem to have set an eye on Pujara. Sure you must be pleased with that.
Do you have a link Bala? If Cheeka has indeed spoken about Pujara, I'd be the happiest! Pujara is another one we have spoken about for long if you recall...as long as Tiwary or earlier than that.
Thanks for the kind words. Deepavali is in the air already and the winter chill can just be felt. How is it at Coimbatore?
The winter chill means, if at all you want five bowlers, then go for a paceman - Munaf Patel alongside Ishant and Zak.
What about dropping Harbhajan? It won't be that bad after all. It comes down to who the better bowler is at this moment. Mishra or Harbhajan. Mishra is largely unknown to the Aussies. I think it would be a worthwhile try.
If they play 3 spinners at the expense of VVS, it would be clear that Kumble does not believe he can deliver. That would be the only conclusion I would come to
It may be wrong to say Laxman should be out. But, on a low bounce pitch, Laxman doesn't do well usually. He gets bowled to the ball that keeps low, I don't know what the technical problem there is with him. This change will only work if Dravid plays well. Otherwise it may backfire on us.
If we go with 3 spinners, there is no way Australia can win at Kotla. It is an advantage to go with leggies on dustbowls because the bowlers will create scruff marks around the crease, on the pitch on days 1 and 2. I believe that may be a good reason for Kumble to be very successful at Kotla. Bowl on the mark, it will turn viciously starting day 3. Easy trick for a legspinner.
* footmarks
Yenkayya, India won at Delhi because 1) their batsmen put up a few more runs than the opps in the first innings and the bowlers then took the wickets.
The problem here is India's batting needs all the hands...there is no guarantee that they will all succeed as we want. And, five bowlers at Delhi was never the initial philosophy - it is something born out of convenience - not to promote India's chances of winning but to accomodate someone.
Laxman, if he is dropped, will not be dropped as part of a policy of change, but simply to accomodate someone who happens to be the captain of his team and a glorious performer in the past.
That is what I have a problem with.
The danger now is, cricketing philosophy will be spun around this move rather than such a move being born out od a philosophy...a cricketing idealogy we adhere to at most times and with suitable objectivity.
My problem is..their answer to avoid a comment on TV will end up becominga philosophy for play.
If they think Kumble is not capable, do not select him. If they think Mishra was given an injury-chance and his time will come later, say and do so...no harm in that...why shy away? That means they do not think Kumble is capable...and yet they say he must play! And who will suffefer? - Laxman!
Amazing...they want Mishra in the team because he will be the guy to take the wickets and not Kumble according to their logic....and so Laxman must pay. And what about when Tendulkar was bumbling about the entire year? Or Dravid?
They can't say anything about Tendulkar or do not want to. So many tmes we felt five bowlers was strategically required but we couldn't drop Tendulkar because he is god...we dropped an opener instead, promoted Dravid...I mean we did stuff and nonsense. Ratrher than drop either Tendulkar or Dravid...now we have no qualms about dropping Laxman for no obvious playing philosopy, strategy or tactic.
People will spin them around this act...India is expert at that.
Hi Golandaaz! Nice to hear from you again :)
Precisely...whoever suggested this curse is also certain that Kumble will not be taking many wickets. That's what troubles me.
Harbhajan is keeping it tight and picking up the odd important wicket...I wouldn't change that.
My point is, you play a player because you believe he will perform - so if you play Kumble, do so and let Mishra bide his time. No problems with that. But why restructure the company by dropping a batsman? What's the logic there?
India needs all those batsmen at Kotla...a perusal of those last 7 matches will tell us that batsmen are needed.
But selecting a player and his cover alongside at the expense of someone else just because the cover did well...smacks of the kind of logic which promoted Dravid alongside Jaffer in Australia...when all the time it was obvious that Sehwag should be playing the opener's role.
If Kumble is unfit and out of form he should not play India should not miss this rare opportunity of nailing the Aussies, I know it will be a bit embarrassing for Kumble to be dropped,he has served his country well in the past and I understand the fans out of respect want him to play, but one should think what if he performs poorly again and his performance hurts India's chances that will be an even bigger embarrassment for him, he should be rested and once he regains form he will have plenty more opportunities to serve his nation.
SB, To be honest, Dravid's form isn't great either compared to Laxman. But, this may be [one of] the last series that Dravid plays, so we can't keep him aside - there's some sympathy for the outgoing players.
The question IMO is not 5 bowlers, but it is about selecting 3 spinners to strangle the opposition at Kotla. It is to make complete use of the nature of the pitch. Akin to going all out pace attack at Perth. As far as I remember, India has played 3 spinners whenever we had good enough spinners to play for India. We had players like Ganguly, Prabhakar sharing the new ball with Kapil/ Srinath/ Zaheer and then we would play Kumble, Raju, Chauhan - all 3 spinners.
The fact that we didn't have a good 2nd pace bowler in the past helped us indirectly - we could rest the 2nd pace bowler [without any murmurs] whenever we wanted to play 3 spinners. But, now we have a situation where we can't keep Zaheer or Ishant out of the match. Both are good bowlers and are troubling the batsmen even on flat pitches. Which is why we are looking to make a bakra among the batsmen. We can go with 2 spinners provided our thinktank gives enough overs to Sehwag. Sehwag is our Clarke but for some reason, I feel, Sehwag is not given more than few overs in test matches after his recent comeback!
You highlighted that Kumble has been pale for most part of the last year. Yes, but he is also riding on sympathy wave and he will be included till he announces retirement. I agree that is not good for the team. I wonder why Vengy who is persistent on sending Ganguly off didn't/ doesn't insist on Kumble doing the same. I would be happy if one of Dravid/ Kumble does a Damien Martyn and retire midway during this series. If we win at Kotla, Kumble should announce his retirement, should be his last match.
SB
It was mentioned in the preview of challengers trophy in cricinfo. Here is the link.
http://content-ind.cricinfo.com/indiandomestic2008/content/story/375004.html
---
India Green
Led by Mohammad Kaif, India Green are strong in batting with the likes of Shikhar Dhawan, Suresh Raina, Yusuf Pathan and
Cheteshwar Pujara, who's probably in the form of his life after smashing two triple-hundreds in a week in the Under-22 CK Nayudu Trophy. His form has drawn the attention of Kris Srikkanth, the new chairman of selectors, who said he will keep an eye on the batsman.
---
Coimbatore is not chill but nice and cool. Heavy rains throughout the week. Sun has gone for a break. Diwali is backing my break with all shopping.
SB did you watch yesterday's match? How did Vijay play? Are you impressed? I am yet to see him play.
What a typo? :)
Diwali is breaking my back with all the shopping.
Wasim, here's hoping Kumble sees it the way you suggest. One positive fallout of his determination is whoever is going to replace him will come through after a battle of excellence.
Yenkayya, OK, let me ask you this way - would you have felt three spinners was the way to play at Kotla if Mishra had taken say, 4 wickets in the Mohali match? maybe by the time he came on to bowl, Ishant had picked up an extra wicket...he beat the bat so much. Would you still have suggested India play three spinners?
Would that have been a policy set before Mishra happened...to play the extra bowler at Delhi?
That's just my point...if you felt always, before regardless of Mishra, then go ahead and play five bowlers. Then I'll ask you who those five bowlers are...what is their current form ...what are the pitch conditions like...and stuff like that.
My grouse is not on five bowler theory...it is on what basis that theory was born, how it was born, and how it is being implemented, if it does get implemented. :)
Thanks Bala...Sorry I just haven't been able to catch the Challenger. I missed the test matches live man! I hope to take in today's game though.
Ha ha ha...backing your break with shopping. I wish someone could back my proposed break! I don't mind if the backing comes in the form of unlimited shopping credit....$150,000 worth would do just fine.
putting a lot of effort maan!!
though i agree kotla pitch does not warrant such move...
but, replacing batsman with batsman and bowler with bowler...?
things are not always that simple...
If we don't have a decent spinner, then we wouldn't think about playing a 3rd spinner. But, 2 wickets in each innings is just fine. To be honest, before the match started, I didn't expect Mishra to take more than 2 in each innings. That's what our trios [or the quartet in the past] used to do - pick 2 or 3 wickets each in one innings. Raju, Chauhan, Karthik, Hirwani etc all picked only 2 or 3 wickets per innings and rarely a 5 fer. That is how we won most of the matches played in India in the 90s.
The last example that I can remember when we played 3 spinners was in Mumbai against Aus. in 2004. The match was over in 2 days. Now, the curator Radhe Shyam said this pitch will be a gift to the captain Kumble.
So, if I were Azza I would go with 3 spinners. If not, a reverse swinging pace bowler for a 3rd spinner atleast.
SP, true, things are not that simple usually.
But this was one hasty baby born in an uncomfortable media moment.
That role, Yenks has been taken up well by our pacers. This has allowed us to play with 4 bowlers.
My point is does the current situation merit adding an extra bowler?
Kumble is the skip and he was out with injury - he must play if he is better.
Post a Comment