At the outset, let me congratulate the Australians for winning the ODI series. Not only did they play better all round cricket, they also valued their desire to succeed a little more than the Indians. While they were intent on restoring a weatherbeaten heritage, the Indians were busy drawing up yet another plan for that perfect tower symbolizing their as yet unhatched achievement.
That was the difference for me - one was an effort in trying to fit lost gems of architecture in their moulds with whatever skill was at command while the other was yet another flight of paper fancy.
India lost because it takes its clichés very seriously - "Just a bad day in office", "you win some, you lose some", "when you play as much, you are bound to lose some" - are just some glitter India likes to clad itself in rather than don the serious habit of a winning philosophy. A routine is only a routine if you attach no significance to the nuts and bolts of what you are doing. Attach purpose to it and that routine becomes discipline which will launch you to real achievements.
The signs were all there; too regularly has India become condescendingly lax in the way it performs its fundamentals the moment it percieves a lead or smells a win. We have seen this in all areas of play on the field many times over. Thus, in effect, India was regularly practising being mediocre...practising chipping away the intricate details of winning gems embedded in them with chisels of easy clichés. A lethargy of purpose taints every victory. Rather than be an elixir to inspire the quest for greater achievements, a win for the Indian team often becomes that wine of victory which stuns the quest for progress with its dulling euphoria. When time asks for application, India is found stumbling on its own lab-cultured laxity.
Let us celebrate the ordeal of coming through on the backs of brilliance of one or two individuals, and sneer instead, at the simplicity of team effort and meaningful implementation of practised routines.
Let us toss ourselves up into giddy stratospheres of frenzy whenever such a brilliance explodes to launch us, however and whenever that may be. Let us thrill in the romance of the unexpected rather than bore ourselves with the regularity of winning...frequent winning that comes with meticulous attention to, and practice and applictaion of, our skills with determined purpose...a good kind of ruthlessness.
One Aaj ki Raattrans & YouTube has enough amnesiac power to make one forget the pain of a million mediocre moments of our plays...let it flow I say!
Let us be doused tonight with so much of high spirits that we can wake up in tomorrow as Dons of our fantasies. If our games get crumpled as we lie stoned in our one night's greatness, no worry, we'll brush them off with a wave of our magical hands, flick them with our mystical wrists come morning, and we'll be ready to go again!
Hey, we can even celebrate moments which were made to appear near by a team member's sudden bloodrush, when they were, in actuality, always distant! And kept that far in the first place due to our extremely poor practices.
Celebrate! Moments are rare, the middleclassness of ruthless devotion and application mundanely swamps the clock and calendars of our existence! Firefly that I am, I build nothing, I leave no history no heritage but the genes I spew in one night and die. I am no mechanic of tireless robotic precision to build outreaches in unexplored space but only a shooting star. Celebrate!
The top order batting failed as strikingly as Sachin Tendulkar and Dhoni's bats arose to speak for India erratically. You could call it "form issues" if you are inclined to be comforting, or you could say it was the lethargy of casualness which shackles your feet, your arms, freezes your eye, when you do not want them to be so. Sehwag, Gambhir, Yuvraj...where is the team effort? Why is it difficult? Why must it be a rare phenomenon for all contribute at the same time, rather than the opposite being rare instead?
Then the fielding and poor lines of bowling....we are fed up with this topic. We have addressed this in different ways, from different directions...the chaps who are in the profession of playing cricket don't really mind screwing up aspects of their job on a regular basis. What can you do with such? The culture of mediocrity, the culture of resting on our heels, the culture of "only this much and no more"....the babugiri of public responsibility is as prevalent an affliction in our private enterprise. It appears that nothing matters...not healthy remuneration, adulation, accessibility, facilities, flexibility, support teams...nothing matters to rid oneself of the peongiri mentality.
Give them everything, pick them up and make them sit on thrones, even then they cannot unspool their tails to become lions.
Forget those close finishes...on both occasions the matches were lost long before they eventually were. A relatively average team managed to prevail because it wanted to a little more than the Indians. Because the Indian fielders, batsmen and bowlers obliged.
Sure, there were some who picked their moments to fight back...like the stray soldiers of a ragged army laying seige to the castle running in to butt their heads on the walls of the fortress in frustration or a rush of adrenaline. It doesn't matter how high they climbed up the walls on the strength of that mad wind which seized them suddenly, you always knew it was only a matter of time before they'd fall away like newspapered flies.
You succeed more often when you wear the correct habits most times...the dull drab dungarees which work well around your frequently used talents...not the stiff glittery coat of common clichés which actually conceal the shapeless softness within.
Ruthless habits matter most when the going gets close. We've said that before and this series has been an illustration. India will not often win bilateral, tri-lateral or major tournaments with such hit and trial methods...kal kaam kiya to aaj so gaye kind of stuff.
"India lost the mental battle - Dhoni"...Bah! That's no rocket science...when you win some and lose some, when you let slip a four every match, when you drop catches every match, when you bat more to an image than for a purpose, when you set fields exotically and bowl even more exotically, you are bound to be unsure of which way the mind bends in the current situation.
To be sure of things, to have a ready reference to draw upon from within, you have to be doing some things in a particular way all the times. Then, you can be sure of your mental battles. Yeah you will still lose games...professionalism is all about making that eventuality as uncommon as possible.
By the way, Bollinger is da Badshah! Gimme one bowler who'll bowl with that kind of heart and skill!
Cricket Quiz - 7 (End of 1st season)
1 hour ago







24 comments:
A scorcher SB... They deserve the slap. A culture of mediocrity... couldn't have eloquently put it better.
P.s: How's your hand coming along.
Scorpi, I couldn't watch those matches live. Not even the replays. I saw the recordings much later.
Some of my relatives, all hardcore cricket fans of different age groups, were in the stadium at Hyd even as I was busy not very far from it the night Sachin tried a desperate rescue act again. They described the poverty of Indian application.
It is a shame he had to try and climb such a steep mountain in the first place.
Mohali was pricked bombast...after the first innings they thought they had won it and relaxed mentally.
Guwahati was abject.
Performances like these earn you memos even in public sectors...if not a suspension.
I bet private sector doesn't stand for consistent mediocrity like this...they'd be fired en masse.
But this is sport, a combat of skills. What is galling is the casualness around the Indian team.
Arre, even if you have to lose, no shame after truly competing.
The tragedy is if India had played with better application, they'd have won this series.
One doesn't mind supporting them in tough times when they are trying...some of these gents aren't giving their best.
WB SB ... brilliant post as ever !
To me the fire was missing in the belly in Indian team, a fire which I had seen in Test series last year. The determination to beat Aussies was simply lacking and that was clearly shown with the way some bastman applied themselves, the way they fielded and the way they bowled defensive lines without ever wanting to take wicket.
Hopefully things will be better for SL Test series with some better professionals coming into side.
Thanks nm.
I have a feeling history will be made in the Indo-Lanka series.
Maybe it will be that Lanka opens its account in India by winning a test, if not the entire series!
I'm peeved with Sehwag and Gambhir. Their poor LOI form has been rather extended and they haven't played enough test matches in between to shake off that.
ODI, T20Is,IPL,CLT20...Gambhir and Sehwag have been iffy. And they are important to India's fortunes.
I just hope this poor run doesn't continue in tests.
Well written, SB.
i think now they will realise what it takes to remain at top... any team can have bad days but great teams usually keeps the gap as wide as possible in their occurrences...
earlier they were not expected to win and the win against top teams used to be seen as underdog defying all odds to beat the favorites... now the table is turned they are favorites to win... it will take some time adjusting to the fact much the same way it to australia some time to reconcile the fact that they are not favorites or the force anymore...
whether they have it in them to cross this hurdle or this is the best they can produce... next few (ODI) series will tell us how they are coping with this new found status coz now even fan want team to behave the way favorites are supposed to...
in any case we are in for interesting times...
Thanks Jonathan.
What impressed me about the Australians was that they remained cool and focussed while India tied itself up in self plaid knots. The captain must surely have played a significant role in keeping Australian the vision simple and straight.
earlier they were not expected to win and the win against top teams used to be seen as underdog defying all odds to beat the favorites... now the table is turned they are favorites to win
Absolutely! You have pinned it down. Whether it is for reasons of quantity of matchplay that Indians are among the top teams of today or a qualitative improvement in their play...or even a mixture of both...the situation is that they cannot play like complete novices after working their way up.
It is almost like an appointed professor constantly going back to the stage of assessment teaching.
The quality of India's cricket has been patchy...and we are talking of a generation of cricketers completely bred in the post-modern era of Indian cricket.
These are teams which have grown up without baggage....the baggage of a new team trying to find its feet in international cricket like Bangladesh has been doing..without the baggage of having watched Sunil Gavaskar opening India's new ball attack to take the shine off...without the baggage of not having significant wins behind you...India had won the world cup around the time most of these players were born....then sat TV, endorsement cricket, career management systems in cricket, coaching etc etc....this generation of cricketers have come up with a different history.
Naturally, their outlook should be different...and it is...and their awareness of the game and what it takes to stay on top should also be different.
Without going overboard in criticism, what is galling is the blow-hot-blow-cold amateur nature persisting in their game.
The boys born in a pro era often play like casual amateurs they have never actually seen playing! Like an unpleasant retro-rerun which we thought we had left behind and forgotten.
SB,
Is the situation as dire as you make it out to be? Having grown up in an era when India taking the field was in itself a major achievement, how can you lose track of the fact that we are now the second best team in the world in ODIs and the third best in Tests.
Someone, somewhere must be doing something right for us to have reached this station, no?
Cheers,
I am worried about the casual attitude creeping in Homer. To that extent, I make it dire.
Two years ago, this was a motivated team which did not let up. That was the reason Misbah holed out.
That was the reason, India won the first bowl out.
Not letting up was also the reason India did well in the CB series.
In fact I felt they showed more desire, even if their skills were rough, in the 2007 home ODI series vs Oz.
To that extent I am worried.
Sure, they have done some things right to be where they are....but they have diluted that winning experiences with the pollutants/adulterants of easygo.
Tell me something Homer, India was capable of winning against these Australians. That they did not is a testimony not only to the determination of Australia but also to the presumptions of Indians which limited them.
It is recognizable...it is always there...there is this "we just have to turn up at the ground to win" attitude which has developed and lurks around the Indians...never far away from them.
This team will win many games too in future, but when it comes to the crunch, when they have to string together a series of wins to win a tournament, they will find extempore efforts are not that reliable.
Brillance must crown the humble breadcake of meaningful routines ike a bright cherry.
SB,
Do you remember the conversation we had on ruthlessness a few days ago on this blog?
Both of us wanted India to be ruthless, to really twist the knife into Australia when we had them down.
Was it because of attitude or was India just too afraid to take on the mantle of #1? Our history is littered with instances of India doing it hard for itself by leaving it to the very last game to make it to the semis or the finals. And then losing it on the biggest stage.
Maybe this is an extension of that.
Maybe it is the case that in 2007 and the CB series, the kids had something to prove and we had zero expectations of them.
Now they are established and our expectations have gone through the roof.
Maybe, just maybe, it is this burden of expectations that is weighing the team down.
Cheers,
You mean stage fright?
Homer, I hope it is just that, for it is curable.
What is difficult to cure are bad habits.
Older teams had far more handicaps than current ones. From resources to incomplete teams (recall the times India couldn't put together two pacemen and Bedi would often open th bowling or Chandra), to attitudinal restrictions.
India was, in the past, trying to measure up in the game British taught its colonials. It was trying to best them. Orthodoxy dominated thought and play...despite the supple wrists of PIOs like Ranji.
Wins could not be sustained because they did not have routines to practice match situations etc etc. Scientific methods. Most former players were left to themselves to maintain their minds, bodies and games.
The opinion of fellow mates constituded the body of knowledge and source of suggestions. Some well founded, others less so.
This team has it all. It has also won with the help more often. But they let themselves down.
There is a streak among these young men which is self-destructive. That streak...call it whatever...makes them ease off and that's a contagious disease.
The mind becomes dulled and rutted like a tambaku paan chewing dada's.
It gets used to the goeasyness of it.
Then you cannot rustle up yourself instantly to become wilbeasts.
Do you recall the pop drama series of Rocky? These chaps have eased off and developed softness with two years of success and much social transformation.
Don't know how many of them have the ability to do the hard yards and get that lazy bug out of their sytems.
Chaps like Ishant are maybe young in cricket relatively speaking, but fellows like Sehwag, Gambhir,Raina...they've been around.
Then bowling...chaps bowling in 120s and 130s are able to tie up Indians but the vice versa is not valid.
This series, in some matches there was effort...but the founadtion bed consistency comes from drills.
Stars don't drill...I mean drill as in practice...at least Indian stars.
While evolving from small town boys, they have left behind many essentials.
SB,
Thats a very cynical viewpoint. If these kids have all the tools and are not able to get past the finish line, does it suggest a looseness in effort or the mind?
And if it is curable,then this series loss is the first big step in that direction.
I leave you with two quotes from Vince Lombardi
"The difference between a successful person and others is not a lack of strength, not a lack of knowledge, but rather a lack of will."
and
"It's not whether you get knocked down, it's whether you get up."
We will know soon enough.
Cheers,
You must see this Homer.
There are things which are not quite all right.
I think I mentioned before that I had some feedback from the B'lore HQ of cricket about some boys. Trust me, the feedback's authentic and some sage men of yore are only shaking their heads in helpless disapproval there.
I just didn't want to go on record with anything here for 1) proof will have to be provided and 2) that could hurt some people in the process I don't want to. they'd be exposed as sources and made to suffer.
And when you see Praveen Kumar puff away like a steam engine and correlate it with his ineffectual leapfrogging on the ground (Ok...in a couple of matches he improved), you know he cannot give better than this. (I got this link from Nestaquin's blog, but it supports things I have been hinting at about the Bang-a-lore boys and such.)
Partying is OK but laxity has replaced many things. They have allowed it to flow into their jobs and we are seeing them lose their grip when they need to be alert.
SB,
For starters, being pictured with females does not readily translate to sleeping with them. I remember not so long ago, after the Symonds slapping the photographer incident, that the Australian media was full of stories of how Aussie cricketers were averse to having their pics taken in public places for fear that those pictures would be misused.
Secondly, Praveen Kumar smoking is a problem since when?
The current Chairman of Selectors was (is) a smoker. There is the famous picture of him holding a cigarette in hand when Kapil was lifting the Prudential Cup.
Shane Warne and Darren Lehmann are talked up to be a throwback to an earlier era because of their smoking. That did not prevent Warne from becoming the best leg spinner in the hisory of the game or Lehmann from coaching the Deccan Chargers to an IPL win.
And how did the smoking prevent Praveen Kumar from doing what he does best and not doing what he is not flash at?
Its one thing to castigate the team for not putting effort on the field but how exactly is it helpful to put the cricketers under a microscope and exaggerate every single thing they do. Or dont, especially in defeat?
Cheers,
No, I didn't say pictured with girls is wrong.
There is a set of may lego pieces of data, which have to be pieced together.
It is a fact that conditions now are different from conditions even two years ago in many cases.
I am sure they are all strong people to have risen up on the strength of their struggles and are not ready to give it away easily.
But it doesn't take much...just an unwanted blink of an eye, a nanosecond delay in transmission, the extra puff of breath you begin to require to maintain existing standards...forget about progress...it happens. Such things happen.
Many things are masked by the versatility of a youthful human body and mind.
The subtle changes are laid bare in competition - where once you adapted successfuly, now you take that extra second. It will show.
CoS Cheeka's decline coincided with his continued smoking. He admitted as much on a wide-ranging TV interview on one of the channels.
We saw him pulling up short well before the boundary pantng hard, and letting others field or see the ball roll over.
He survived on sheer talent as much as they could sustain him. The excesses began to tell.
Cheeka was a batsman...this fellow is a pace bowler, and not even a spinner.
If he was smoking beedis from long, he shouldn't be doing so now. He should be more enlightened by the greater awareness, tools and support faculty available to explain things. If he continues to do so, that is reinforcing the point I am trying to make. Some chaps are growing bigger than the game and therefore casual about it and what it takes to achieve and remain as champs. They are bringing thisn stuff to office.
I don't know, but is there a clause somewhere in their contract that they must not do anything to detract from their efficient working for the company?
Well maybe I am all wrong about this.
It is possible there isn't anything wrong with their performances and I am only seeing ghosts. I accept...I could be wrong in my my observations, deductions and feelings.
I hope they prove me wrong many times over with smart consistent plays.
SB,
Cheeka played his cricket in more forgiving/less enlightened times.
If Praveen Kumar's smoking impedes his ability as a cricketer, he will be found out and discarded sooner than you can say why!
Thats how unforgiving the system is now.
The difference between a series win and a series defeat was 7 runs. 4 at Vadodara and 3 at Hyderabad. That is how close we are to becoming #1.
But the bigger picture is this - while we may surmount the gap between where we are and being #1 with a concerted push, our aim has to be much higher - we have everything in place to build a dynasty. All it requires is for the spirit to be willing.
And we will know about how ambitious these kids are sooner rather than later.
Cheers,
Interesting discussion SB / Homer.
Homer, if we see series losing margin as just 7 runs then we are deluding ourselves. Harbhajan and Praveen at Vadodara (1st ODI) was a mix of luck and poor Australian bowling. They fueled as Harbhajan and PK drove the vehicle forward.
Mohali and Guwahati ODIs lost us the series. We lost a match that we should have won at Mohali and turned up meek at Guwahati.
Hyderabad was a Sachin story. Looks like they (other than Sachin) didn't believe they could win until Sachin took them close. Raina's application or the lack of it and Jadeja's running between the wickets beats me.
It may be too much cricket or too much money, whatever it is but surely this team is losing focus of what it wants to achieve. May be it is lacking the desire to win or thinks it can win just by being present. At least that's how I see Mohali defeat.
Bala, Mohali was the decoction extracted from soaking in many bad habits. The bowling had righted itself for the match because 1) the wicket helped and 2 they were still smarting from the criticism they faced at Vadodra.
But then the batsmen thought, "Ha! We have this one in the bag!" Before they actually did.
Overconfidence....probably underestimation of the opposition and overestimation of the self.
bala... you can not discard bhajji and praveen's effort in that match... they really fought hard and forced bowlers to dish that dirty stuff by relentlessly attacking them...
had no.8 or 9 batsman from oz would have attacked the way they did we would have been doing 1) singing praise of the never say die attitude of oz or any other team 2) scathing out bowler to allow 8 and 9 batsmen to run so close and not closing the game out early...
the lost to series can be attributed to the brain freeze we had in mohali... till that time only one team was looking like winning series and that was not australia by long distance...
that was turning point of the series... for me...
Mohali was concentrated poison SP...I agree.
Curiously, the batting slumped after the second better fielding and bowling efforts from India on the trot.
Somewhere in all this haphazardness and misfiring, I see people straying a bit. I'm sure they can get their act together and return to be the band of small town boys with winning ways they used to be....at least in cricketing terms.
SP, it was a wonderful effort by Harbhajan and PK. That's why I didn't call it a fluke. But then disciplined bowling could have shut the doors pretty early for us in that match. Their bowling, Watson in particular, was poor. Even if it is poor you have to put it away and that Harbhajan and PK did well and really fought hard.
Mohali was where we lost SB. There cannot be a valid reason for that defeat. That was very poor showing by the Indian team. I am happy tests are back. ODI actors can return to their state teams and play some good solid cricket, especially the likes of Raina, Jadeja, and Praveen.
Balajhi,
"Mohali and Guwahati ODIs lost us the series. We lost a match that we should have won at Mohali and turned up meek at Guwahati."
One an instance of over confidence, the other of bad decision making.Neither of which are insurmountable problems.
And the fact that Bhajji and PK took the game down to the wire in the first ODI tells you something about the pluck and the fight in this team doesn't it?
Cheers,
Yes Homer but that's something missing at the top and in the middle.
Post a Comment